Archive for March, 2014

The Grave Risks for Journalists and Those Who Stand for Freedom of Expression in Honduras
by Ismael Moreno Coto

Testimony of Rev. Ismael Moreno Coto, S.J. for the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing on “Worldwide Threats to Media Freedom,” 25 July 2012

 

Standing up for freedom of expression is, without a doubt, one of the most uncomfortable experiences in life; and in a country like Honduras, it means living with anxiety, insecurity, suspicion, distrust, demands, warnings, and threats.  It also means having to come to grips with the idea of death.

 

How can opinions be freely expressed, news and information given, and analysis shared in a country where the very institutions of the state have been distorted?  How can freedom of expression be exercised in a country where all of the rules have been broken and we have been left with violence and death as the only criteria and parameters to guide ourselves by?

 

In the last three years, 25 journalists and social communicators have been murdered in Honduras.  The names and further information about them are included at the end of this report.  Why were they murdered?  What is the common pattern in these crimes?  It is not an ideological or political pattern, because the dead include people who were part of the resistance to the coup, but also those who worked for media outlets that supported the coup.  Some had not sided with any of the various ideological currents of our very polarized political sectors.  What is the pattern, then, of so much death?

 

It is true that, in the murders of journalists and social communicators, express political or ideological patterns do not emerge as the major pattern.  However, the murders do show a clear pattern; they have all occurred in a place where institutional state structure has been deformed and adulterated, where the government has stopped being an expression of the rule of law and has chosen instead to represent and channel the interests and decisions of those who believe in rule by the strongest.

 

And this is the most terrible thing about these deaths: in Honduras today, a person who works in front of a microphone (or a computer or a camera) only has to publish or disseminate some news that negatively affects the interests a powerful person with money and influence in the community, municipality, or province for the life of that news reporter to be endangered.  The risk increases when these journalists and social communicators touch on unresolved controversial issues, such as the defense of — or demand for — land, natural resources, health, or education; or when they talk about having a tax policy where everyone contributes to the government according to their profits, income, and property; or about the need for impartiality in the law; or simply the need for a justice system that works; or the fact that people are demanding democratization, access to public information, and access to the media.

 

The institutions of the state have been so crushed that it is easy to manipulate them in favor of groups that already have power, money, and other privileges.  The Honduran state is being used as an instrument to strengthen the impunity of the most powerful.  If social communicators in a municipality decide to publish news that impacts the interests of a person or a family with power and money, that person or family can easily hire a couple of hit men to eliminate whoever had the temerity to mention them on the radio or in the local media.  The government knows this is happening, but its institutions and officials have become a shield that protects the strong and makes sure they are immune to prosecution so they can act with complete impunity.

 

The situation is the most serious at the level of a community or a municipality, because those who benefit from “the law of the strongest” there know that the state will not touch them no matter what.  People with power and money have protection from policemen, prosecutors, and judges.  Public officials enjoy the relationship with these “strong” groups because of the economic benefits and perks they receive, which end up being much higher than the wages they earn.  And those who exercise “the law of the strongest” know for sure they can act with complete impunity because the most a state will ever do is arrest and try someone who has executed a crime; it will never touch those who actually gave the orders, because those people are protected by the state.  In some cases, a powerful few actually take the place of the state itself in certain localities.

 

In the system of “the law of the strongest,” power may be wielded by a policeman, a lumber magnate, an agro-industrialist, a congressman, a mayor, an owner of a national media outlet, a cattle rancher, a businessman, or a drug trafficker.  It doesn’t matter what the person’s affiliation is.  They are all protected under the shadow of illegality, which knows how to move down the halls of legality and official institutions.  Most of the powerful few have tourist visas to come in and out of the United States.  Not a few of them are prominent businessmen or politicians.  Some are invited on an ongoing basis to celebrate Independence Day in the residency of the American ambassador in Tegucigalpa.

 

The primary protectors and promoters of impunity in the Honduran state are: 1) the current justice system, from the local judges to the magistrates of the Supreme Court of Justice; 2) the Public Ministry, headed by the Attorney General; 3) the Ministry of Security; particularly the Police, both preventative and investigative; and 4) the Armed Forces.  Many people who operate with impunity have some protection in one or all of these institutions, and these institutions look to the National Congress, starting with its president, to find a kind of political backing where everything is negotiated, calculated, and decided upon to ensure different levels of impunity to protect people with power and money.

 

In this highly precarious context and environment of arbitrary actions by government institutions, the death of journalists and social communicators will continue to be cloaked in impunity, because impunity is part and parcel of a society like Honduras that props itself up using the law of the strongest.  Even today, in the agreements signed after the coup d’état, political matters have been touched on, and politicians have maneuvered so that their conflicts can be played out in the political electoral sphere.  But impunity remains intact and it continues to be untouchable, because we are talking about the intimate conspiracy between the state and those who exercise the law of the strongest.

 

This explains why the work of journalists and social communicators has become the most dangerous of all jobs in Honduras.  I want to speak clearly without beating around the bush: the deaths of journalists and social communicators represent the most sophisticated of all political crimes in Honduras today.  According to the United Nations Special Rapporteur for the Freedom of Expression and Opinion, Frank La Rue, “in proportion to its population, Honduras has the most alarming violation of the freedom of expression in the world, and is the country in which the most journalists have been killed in the least amount of time.”

 

How can we reach a place where the press is independent and autonomous when so many and diverse powers are pressuring, blackmailing, threatening, and seducing the media and its journalists?  How can a journalist act with independence in an environment that conditions his/her salary and job security on loyalty to the interests of the proprietor, particularly in a society like ours where having a stable job is a luxury?  How can the media become independent in a society where democratic institutions are subordinated to the arbitrary decisions of those who abide by “the law of the strongest”?  How can freedom of expression be defended in a country like Honduras where the biggest violators of this fundamental freedom are the friends and partners of a “democracy” backed by policies and agencies of the United States government?

 

It is also clear that, in Honduras, no system exists to monitor threats to journalists, and none of the protective measures provided actually guarantee the safety of threatened journalists, a situation aggravated by the weakness of the Honduran state.  Drug trafficking and political violence are defining the patterns of violence.  And the sectors that are able to intimidate others with their power or to threaten the freedom of expression have at least tacit protection from the government of the United States.

 

At Radio Progreso, we are committed to building a democratic, inclusive, and participatory society with an institutional structure and functioning that translates into real rule of law.  As long as the international community — and the United States in particular — channels its support to the current Honduran institutions, such as the Ministry of Security, the Public Ministry, the Supreme Court of Justice, and the Armed Forces, impunity will continue to be a macabre expression of the Honduran landscape, and we will continue to see journalists die, as we ask ourselves anxiously when it will be our turn.  We need new institutions that grow out of a deep questioning of the current system.  The commitment to a new set of institutions and to the rule of law must grow out of a confrontation with those who are operating with impunity in today’s institutions, and it can only come from bringing diverse sectors of society together to create a social pact based on basic common agreements.  This is the only way we can create conditions that will guarantee freedom of expression.

 

In Honduras we do not reach for the “maximum,” because our entire institutional system is broken, and because the human, social, ethical, political, and institutional fabric of our nation has been torn.  In Honduras, the maximum is found by seeking consensus around “minimum” shared agreements.  As long as we do not build those minimum shared agreements, freedom of expression will always be a precarious reality.  In that struggle, we are on the side of the communities and populations whose voices are seldom heard in the diverse forums and spaces that exist today.  We do our work accompanied by the spirit of Monsignor Romero, who told us that “no matter what is happening politically, no matter who has power, the poor are the most important group to keep in mind.”

 

Journalists Murdered in Honduras

 

This is a list of Honduran journalists and social communicators who have been murdered since 2009, according to information from the files of Radio Progreso and ERIC-SJ.

 

2009

 

Gabriel Fino Noriega (July 2)
Executed in the community of San Juan Pueblo by men who fired on him from a moving vehicle.  Preliminary information indicated that he had received threats earlier after covering the activities of the organized popular resistance on local radios after the coup d’état, and after having expressed his personal repudiation of the coup.

 

2010

 

Nicolas Asfura (February 18)
This journalist, aged 42, was found dead in his apartment in Colonia Santa Barbara in Tegucigalpa.  He graduated with a degree in Communication Sciences in 1988 from the National Autonomous University of Honduras.  He worked as a journalist on Channel 45 and was also a radio announcer for stations in Comayaguela and Tegucigalpa.

 

Joseph Hernandez Ochoa (March 1)
This television journalist, age 26, was shot to death as he was traveling by car in Tegucigalpa.  His colleague Karol Cabrera was also wounded in the attack, which she blamed on the followers of former president Manuel Zelaya.  She is now in exile in Canada.

 

David Meza Montesinos (March 11)
51 years of age, he was shot to death in La Ceiba (Honduran Atlantic Coast), the third largest city of Honduras.  He was a correspondent for the Channel 10 TV news show “Abriendo Brecha,” broadcast from Tegucigalpa, and he also worked for local radio stations.

 

Nahúm Palacios Arteaga (March 14)
Dead at 34 years of age.  Murdered while driving home in the municipality of Tocoa in the department of Colón.  He worked for Channel 5 and Radio Tocoa.  The Inter-American Commission of Human Rights had asked for precautionary measures for him in 2009 after he received threats from members of the military after the coup d’état.

 

Bayardo Mairena y Manuel Juárez (March 26)
Journalist Jose Bayardo Mairena Ramírez, 52, and his assistant Manuel Juárez, 54, were shot to death as they were driving near Juticalpa, 200 km east of Tegucigalpa.  Mairena was the host of program called “Asi es Olancho” on Radio Excelsior, and he worked on Channel RZ, Channel 4, and “Super 10” Radio.

 

Luis Chévez Hernández (April 11)
Radio announcer Luis Chévez Hernández, 23, was murdered in San Pedro Sula.  He did musical programming at Radio W105, a station aimed at a young audience.  He was murdered along with a family member.

 

Jorge Alberto Orellana (April 20)
The journalist popularly known as “Georgino,” 48 years of age, was shot and killed as he left the television station where he was working in San Pedro Sula, the second largest city in Honduras.  He was the host of the program “Live with Georgino.”  He worked for many years for the television station, Televicentro, a business that supported the coup d’état, but he had stopped working for that organization before his death.  He was a professor of journalism at the UNAH in its San Pedro Sula campus.

 

Luis Arturo Mondragón (June 14)
This communicator, age 53, was reported dead in eastern Honduras.  He was murdered at 10 pm on June 14 in the community of Santa Clara in the municipality of Danlí, department of El Paraiso, some 150 kilometers from Tegucigalpa.  He was the News Directors on Channel 19.

 

Israel Días Zelaya (August 4)
Known popularly as “Chacatay,” he was found dead on a sugar cane plantation in Villanueva, Cortes, 30 minutes from San Pedro Sula.  He worked on the program “Claro y Pelado,” under the direction of journalist Carlos Rodríguez Panting on international radio.  He also worked on the program “Comentando la Noticia” directed by Jesus Vélez Banegas.  He was a collaborator on the television program “Tele-Diario” directed by Gabriel García Ardón.

 

Henry Suazo (December 24)
A correspondent of HRN, he worked for the company Cable Vision del Atlántico (CVA) which owns Channel 9 in Santa Ana and Channel 29 in San Juan Pueblo.  He was also a correspondent for Channel 6 in San Pedro Sula.  For two years he was a correspondent for Radio Progreso.  He was murdered in San Juan Pueblo, 20 minutes from La Ceiba, Atlántida, in the northern part of the country.

 

2011

 

Hector Francisco Medina Polanco (May 10)
This social communicator lost his life at Mario Catarino Rivas Hospital in San Pedro Sula after being shot three times in the back as he was leaving his workplace at Omega Vision in Morazán, Yoro by presumed hit men who were riding a motorcycle.  He was born March 5, 1974.

 

Luis Mendoza (May 19)
The owner of a media outlet in Danil, El Paraiso, Mendoza was murdered in eastern Honduras by several heavily armed men who shot at him at close range.  This happened near the Manuel Adalid Gamero school, a half-block from the station where he worked.  He was an agricultural engineer by profession, having graduated from the Zamorano Agricultural School in 1992.  He was the owner of a business called Microsistemas, which owned the rights to Channel 24.  The vehicle carrying Luis Mendoza’s murderers was burned by the police.

 

Adán Benítez (July 4)

 

He was killed on July 4 in La Ceiba, Atlantida on the Atlantic Coast of Honduras.  This murder happened at night when he was on his way home to his place of residence in the city of La Ceiba on the street that goes by Hospital Dantoni, the main care center in the city.  He worked for several media outlets: Radio Mackintosh, and Channel 14 (local channel and closed circuit).  He had also worked at Channel 36, Tele Ceiba, Channel 7, and on other radio programs.  One week earlier, he had reported being threatened by a band of robbers.  But the police maintain that his murder was a result of common crime.  He was 42 years old and had worked in journalism for more than 15 years.

 

Nery Jeremías Orellana (July 13)
Communicator and correspondent for Radio Progreso in Candelaria, Lempira.  General Administrator of Radio Joconguerra.  On July 13, 2011 he was assassinated on his way to work, intercepted on the highway by hit men who murdered him while he was on his motorcycle.  A week before his murder, he made several reports on the Radio Progreso news shows about the problem of healthcare in his area.

 

Medardo Flores (September 8)
On September 8, Flores, 62, was ambushed in his car and killed as he was travelling back from a property located near Puerto Cortes.  He died of nine gunshot wounds.  He was a very well-known communicator in the northern city of San Pedro Sula and was part of the cultural collective of Radio Uno.

 

Luz Marina Paz and Delmer Canales (December 6, Journalist and Cameraman)
Murdered in Comayaguela, as they were riding in their car on December 6, 2011.  Paz died alongside cameraman Delmer Canales, who was also her cousin, in the Colonia San Francisco de Comayaguela in the capital city of the country.  She worked on the program “Tres en la Noticia” which is broadcast through Radio Globo.  Then she began to work at the Cadena Hondurena de Noticias (CHN) radio station.  The vehicle they were riding in had 47 bullet holes in it, according to information provided by the police.

 

2012

 

Fausto Evelio Hernández (March 11)
Murdered March 11, 2012 in the department of Colón.  He worked for 15 years in Radio Alegre.  He led the radio news team along with his colleague Holver Velásquez.  At the time of his assassination, he was riding a bicycle in the municipality of Saba, Colón.  He died at the hands of an unknown man who killed him with a machete.  He was 54 years old when he died.

 

Saira Fabiola Almendaries Borjas (March 1)
A 22-year-old journalism intern, murdered with two other companions in San Pedro Sula, March 1, 2012.  She was murdered in a sector of Rio Blanquito, Choloma in the department of Cortés.  She was completing her degree at the Metropolitan University of Tegucigalpa.  She worked on the sports program “A Ras de Cancha” and on the sports program for Radio Cadena Voces.

 

Noel Valladares (April 23)
Better known as “el Tecolote” (the owl), he was presenting a forecast program on the local lottery in Tegucigalpa.  He died April 23 when four unknown men shot at him at the gates of the Maya TV Channel.  This communicator was very tied to entertainment through a TV program.  He was 28 years old.

 

Erick Alexander Martínez Avila (May 7)
32 years old, and a member of the group KUKULCAN, a gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender group in Honduras, he was kidnapped May 5 two days before his death.  His lifeless body was found in the community of Guasculile on the highway from Tegucigalpa to Olancho.  According to forensic experts, his body did not show signs of any injuries.  It is presumed that his death was caused by asphyxiation.  He was last seen in public at the May 1st march.  He was part of one of the factions of the Libertad y Refundacion (LIBRE) Party.

 

Angel Alfredo Villatoro Rivera (May 15)
He was kidnapped on May 9, 2012 on his way to his workplace for his usual presentation at the Radio HRN News Program where he was News Director.  Married to journalist Karla Fonseca, he had been a journalist for more than two decades and was very tied to the ruling party and at one of the channels with the most influence on the political and social life of Honduras.  A native of a northern area of Honduras, in the former banana fields of El Progreso, Yoro, he was found dead May 15 in the southern part of the capital city.  When his body was found, he was dressed in the uniform of the “cobras,” which is military and police attire.

 

Adonis Felipe Gutiérrez Bueso (July 8)
Murdered July 8 along with two of his cousins, identified as Francisco Iraheta López and Miguel Angel Gutiérrez, both 18 years of age.  They were kidnapped by several individuals who shot at them repeatedly on one of the streets of the Colonia Siboney of Villanueva, Cortes.  Adonis Felipe lived in Colonia Jefry in Sonaguera in the department of Colón.  He had been working in the media for more than six years.  Until a few months ago he had been working for Radio Naranja, where he had a program called “Noticias de la Tarde” from 6 to 7 pm.  Since 2007, he had been working for Radio Songuera, which belongs to a network of community, popular, and alternative radios in Honduras.  He was buried in his hometown Arenas, in Sonaguera, Colón.

 

According to information gathered by Radio Progreso and by ERIC, 25 people linked to journalism and communications have been killed since the June 2009 coup d’état.  Eight were under the age of 35, two were women, and one belonged to the LGBT movement.  Several of them worked on news shows, were hosts for entertainment or sports programs, or they administered media outlets.

 

The following numbers of journalists have been killed, by year: 2009 (1); 2010 (11); 2011 (7); and 2012, to date (6).

 

National Human Rights Commission statistics.  The National Human Rights Commission (CONADEH) has records of the violent death of several members of the field of journalism between 2003 and the 2009 coup d’état.  They include: German Rivas, Carlos Salgado, Rafael Munguía, Osman Rodrigo López, and Bernardo Rivera Paz.  CONADEH reported more than two dozen journalists who have lost their lives during the government of Porfirio Lobo.

 

Journalists killed violently

 

2007
1. Germán Rivas (Corporación Maya Visión Channel 7) Copán, firearm.
2. Carlos Salgado (Radio Cadena Voces, RCV), Francisco Morazán, firearm.

 

2008
3. Fernando González (Radio Mega FM 92.7), Santa Bárbara, firearm.

 

2009
4. Bernardo Rivera Paz (Copán)
5. Rafael Munguía (Radio Cadena Voces, Cortés) firearm.
6. Osman Rodrigo López (Channel 45), Francisco Morazán, firearm.
7. Gabriel Fino Noriega (Correspondent of Radio América), Atlántida, firearm.

 

2010
8. Nicolás Asfura (Constsruction company), Francisco Morazán.
9. Joseph Hernández (Channel 51), Francisco Morazán, firearm.
10. David Meza (correspondent of “Abriendo Brecha” program), Atlántida, firearm.
11. Nahún Palacios (Channel 5 of Aguán), Colón, firearm.
12. Bayardo Mairena (Channel 4 of Juticalpa), Olancho, firearm.
13. Manuel de Jesús Juárez (Channel 4 of Juticalpa), Olancho, firearm.
14. Luis Chévez Hernández (host on W105), Cortés, firearm.
15. Georgino Orellana (Cable TV Honduras), Cortés, firearm.
16. Carlos Humberto Salinas Midence (sports writer), Francisco Morazán, firearm.
17. Luis Arturo Mondragón (Channel 19), El Paraíso, firearm.
18. Israel Díaz Zelaya (Radio Internacional), Cortés, firearm.
19. Henry Orlando Suazo (correspondent for HRN), Atlántida, firearm.

 

2011
20. Héctor Francisco Medina Polanco, Yoro, firearm.
21. Luis Mendoza (owner of company called Macrosistema and Channel 24), El Paraíso, firearm.
22. Adán Benítez (televisión producer), Atlántida, firearm.
23. Nery Geremías Orellana (Radio Joconguera), Lempira, firearm.
24. Medardo Flores (volunteer for Radio Uno), Cortés, firearm.
25. Luz Marina Paz (Honduran News Network), Francisco Morazán, firearm.

 

2012
26. Saira Fabiola Almendares Borjas (Channel 30 and Radio Cadena Voces), Cortés, firearm.
27. Fausto Elio Hernández Arteaga (Radio Alegre), Colón, arma blanca.
28. Noel Valladares.
29. Erick Martínez (Spokesperson for the Kukulcán group), Tegucigalpa. May 7, 2012.
30. Alfredo Villatoro (Radio HRN), Tegucigalpa, May 15, 2012.
31. Adonis Felipe Gutierrez Bueso.

 


Father Ismael Moreno, known as Padre Melo, is Director of Radio Progreso in Honduras, which has received an award from Reporters Without Borders and the Global Media Forum for its bravery in reporting despite being the target of repeated attacks and threats.

DEFENDING WATER: THE STRUGGLE
STOKING UP POPULAR FLAMES
Ismael Moreno SJ

DEFENDING WATER: THE STRUGGLE
STOKING UP POPULAR FLAMES
Ismael Moreno SJ

O n the 23rd of August 2003 some thirty thousand
people from the north, south, east and west of
Honduras took over all parts of the capital to
demand the non-privatization of drinking water.
From five in the morning the protesters occupied the four
main entries and exits of Tegucigalpa, led by the National
Coordination of Popular Resistance (CNRP), a movement
which brings together trade unions, and social, popular,
indigenous and community organisations from all over the
country.
The drop which made the cup overflow was the decision
of the majority of deputies in the National Congress to
approve a Draft Law on Drinking Water and Basic
Sanitation, following recommendations from technicians in
the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). It was
approved on the 14th of August. The heads of political
parties in the National Congress had signed an agreement
on March 4th that year with the Honduranian social
organizations represented in the CNRP to approve no law
on drinking water not based on an agreement between the
various sectors of Honduranian society. At the same time,
the peoples’ organisations had committed themselves to
start a consultation process with the aim of presenting on
July 1st that same year a proposal for a law on water in
place of the proposal drawn up under the guidance of the
IADB.
On July 1st the CNRP presented its proposal arguing that
the protection, administration and preservation of water was
linked to the principle of national sovereignty, and that
under no circumstances should the State abdicate its
responsibility for managing such a resource. Members of
Congress received the proposed law but then buried it in
oblivion.
The proposal for the privatization of water promoted by
the IADB with full support from the government of the
Republic contained a catch which fooled several leaders of
the popular movements. The proposed law was not
presented as a means to achieve the privatization of water.
It was presented as a proposal to “municipalize” water
services, thereby contributing to the decentralization of
public services, exactly the goal that many social and
popular sectors were fighting for.
An important argument in favour of the law proposed by
the IADB and the Government was the inefficiency of the
State institution responsible for administering the provision
of drinking water, caught as it was in a paralysing
bureaucracy, politically determined decisions and the
corruption of its officials. The IADB and the Government
saw here a great opportunity to break with an incompetent
administration and move towards empowering
municipalities in the matter of water as a strategic resource.
With this trick, the government and IADB officials won
the support of most of the 298 mayors in the country.
However, clauses in the new Law for Drinking Water and
Basic Sanitation envisaged “service providers”, which
meant that municipalities could hand over the
administration and maintenance of drinking water to
private institutions and organisations which, by charging a
fee, would guarantee both the efficiency of the system and
a profit for themselves.
The Law on Drinking Water and Basic Sanitation was
passed with the support of the majority of mayors and an
important group of NGOs who fell into the trap of the law
proposed by the IADB and Government, both interested in
decentralising and empowering municipalities in the
administration of natural resources. The central
Government, with the support of the IADB, warned
mayors that if they did not approve the Drinking Water
Law they would not qualify for loans destined for the
environment or the protection of natural resources.
For the first time in many decades, however,
r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f organisations from all over the
country met to plan a joint reaction. Copies of the
proposed law to be discussed in the National Congress were
distributed in all regions of the country and studied by many
grass-root organizations.
Many saw through the trick and highlighted the clear bias
towards privatisation favoured by the law in the 65 articles of
the official version. In the same manner, a consultation
process was launched on the peoples’ wishes with respect
to a law on water that would protect water basins, ensure
the preservation of water, and provide an efficient
administration shared by the central Government,
municipalities, water authorities, local associations and
other organisations.
The struggle against the privatisation of water had
achieved a miracle – calling on and uniting in a common
campaign regions and organisations hitherto engaged in
small localized campaigns. The popular mobilization of
the 26th of August 2003 was the expression of a greater
unity concentrated on one objective: to defend drinking
water. Preparations for the great mobilization are full of
anecdotes. In some cities in the north and interior of the
country collections were organised to raise money for
buses that would carry people to the capital. In others
communities radio stations cooperated in organising
marathons with the same aim of raising funds.
The Ministry of Security accused the demonstrators of
receiving money even from drug-traffickers to finance
their popular rally. Other government civil servants
accused international development organisations of
making funds available to agitate against and destabilize
the Government of the Republic. The Government
managed to stir people up through infiltrators, and when
the march reached the National Congress, a group of
demonstrators besieged the police guarding the building to
the point of provoking violence, which finally ended the
mobilization programme.
The Government accused the leaders of the mobilization
of making the Drinking Water Law an excuse to create a
situation of chaos and political destabilisation. Both the
IADB and the Government launched a strong publicity
campaign to discredit the movement that opposed to the
water law and to pressurise mayors and a sector of NGOs to
give their support to the official
law.
Finally, the Law on Drinking Water was approved and ratified
by the President of the Republic. Two years after the struggle,
municipalities are busy seeking those “providers” best able to
buy the right of administering the service of drinking water.
The approval of this law was an anteroom for the approval of the
Free Trade Area with the United States with its corresponding
process of privatization of various public services.
Together with the struggle for the non-privatization of
water however, the country has taken on a direct struggle
for the defence of Honduranian forests, marching hundreds
of kilometres from communities far in the interior to the
capital in what has been called “The March for Life.”
The IADB and the Government may have achieved the
immediate objective of approving the Law of Drinking
Water and taken the necessary measures for its
implementation; in balance, the outcome of the campaign
was one of victory for the IADB and the Government and
of defeat for the social resistance movement. But what they
did not succeed in repressing is the growing conscience of
citizens in their struggle to defend natural resources and the
environment. At the present moment, several communities
in the interior of the country are preparing to resist
implementation of the Law on Drinking Water. And they are
also preparing themselves to resist the indiscriminate
cutting down of their forests, and the use of land and natural
resources in projects that almost exclusively benefit the
multinationals. These multinationals are keenly interested
in the region but not so much in its biodiversity. The
inference is inevitable: the protection and preservation of
this biodiversity, which the Central American region still
enjoys, depend on the immediate future of the resistance
struggle waged by the popular social classes. And
ultimately on this struggle depends the very future of life
itself in Central America.

Translation by Michael Campbell-Johnston SJ
Ismael Moreno SJ
Director, ERIC

An Option for the Poor in Honduras

Luke Hansen, S.J.

Luke Hansen, S.J., an associate editor of America, created this photo journal after participating in a delegation to Honduras in September 2013. The delegation, representing Jesuit ministries in the United States and Canada, sought to learn more about the challenges facing the country following the military coup in 2009 and the response of the Catholic Church.
A year ago a new law in Honduras opened the door to further exploration of mining sites throughout the country. Multinational mining companies are increasingly exploiting land that campesinos have lived on and farmed for decades. On Sept. 10, 2013, the delegation met with community leaders and farmers in Nuestra Señora del Pilar de Arizona Parish in the state of Atlántida who face intimidation from mining companies. (Click on any of the photos to begin a slideshow with captions.)
“We have been threatened,” Enrique Castillo told us through an interpreter, “because we have defended the poorest people, the land and the water.” On Feb. 13, 2013, members of his village in northern Honduras helped hang a chain in front of his house to send a clear message to the mining companies: we are not selling; stay away from our land. The next day, he said, the police arrived, shot down the chain, asked for their names and promised to return.
Community members, with the support of their local pastor and bishop, have raised serious concerns about the environmental consequences of mining in the region. One member of the parish asked Fernando Serrano, a professor of public health at Saint Louis University, to test the quality of the community’s water supply.
The community expressed their concerns about the mining companies to their Claretian pastor, Father Cesar Espinoza (center), who was spurred into action. In this photo, Father Espinoza shares documentation of the new mining concessions in the region, which describe where the mining companies can explore and what they are looking for. The new law also permits the environmental impact study to be conducted by a private corporation rather than an independent state audit. Concepcion (right), a member of the parish, was hosting human rights observers when her house was invaded. She was threatened and had to take sanctuary in the church with her two children.
Father Espinoza shares documentation of “denunciations,” which he filed with the prosecutor, police, ombudsman for human rights and the government office for mining regulation. He has issued official complaints about threats received by members of the community and himself, mining employees going onto land that is not within the ownership of the company and a lack of due process for informing the community about the environment impact of mining.
The delegation met with Bishop Michael Lenihan, O.F.M., of La Ceiba, to discuss social concerns within his diocese. In June, the diocese published a pastoral letter, signed by Bishop Lenihan, which laid out a theology of care for creation, an option for the poor and the common good. It voiced opposition to the “avalanche of mining projects” in the state of Atlántida, the negative environmental impact, the militarization of the region and the defamation and threats directed toward Father Espinoza and his colleagues. It called the imposition of mining projects without any consultation with local communities an “outrage to personal and collective human rights,” and requested consultation and trustworthy studies of the environment impact.
The delegation met with leaders of ERIC (Equipo de Reflexion, Investigacion y Comunicacion), a Jesuit-sponsored social research and advocacy center in El Progreso, Honduras, on Sept. 8, 2013. Francisco describes the work of a campesino organization in Valle Sula. Magdalena, his wife, is an elected leader of the organization. She said a subsidiarity of SABMiller, a multinational brewing and beverage company, wants their land.
The delegation meets with community leaders and displaced farmers in the community of Guadalupe Carney, Honduras, on Sept. 9, 2013. The community is named after Jim (Guadalupe) Carney, S.J., a beloved missionary from St. Louis, Mo., who worked among Honduran campesinos in the 1960s and 70s. He disappeared in 1983 and has yet to be found. More than 500 Hondurans gathered to celebrate his life with a march and Mass in El Progreso on Sept. 14.
Ismael Moreno Coto, S.J. (left), popularly known as Padre Melo, speaks with Chabelo Morales (center) at the penal farm of La Ceiba, Honduras, on Sept. 9, 2013. Chabelo is from the community of Guadalupe Carney. In 2008 a police official killed a man in the community. The next day the community went to recover the body, a battle ensued, a landowner died and the police ordered the arrests of 32 campesinos. Only Chabelo, however, was arrested. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to prison, even though he never had an opportunity to defend himself in court. Padre Melo believes Chabelo is innocent. “Essentially,” Padre Melo explained, “he was punished for the group’s crime.” In November 2013, a court ordered a new trial for Chabelo and ordered his release from the prison farm.
The delegation stands near a memorial for Jim Carney, S.J., at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in Tegucigalpa, the capital city, on Sept. 11, 2013.
The delegation meets with Julieta Castellanos, the chancellor of the National Autonomous University of Honduras, on Sept. 11, 2013. The university hosted a panel discussion on major issues facing Honduras, and announced a partnership with ERIC, the Jesuit-sponsored social research and advocacy organization.
Tegucigalpa, the capital of Honduras
The delegation encountered numerous military checkpoints during our travels throughout the country. International partners like the United States can have a simplistic response to the violence in Honduras: increase the strength of state institutions like the military and police. This strategy, however, fails to account for the depth of corruption in the military and police forces. At one checkpoint, we were told to get out of the van, and the military personnel did a thorough search. For what? We were never told.
People are demanding greater security and Juan Orlando Hernandez, the newly elected president of Honduras, favors a further militarization of the police force. But this strategy has a downside. “One of the most troubling things about the military police law and generally the militarization of society is the lack of accountability this generates,” explained Shaina Aber, the policy director for the U.S. Jesuits’ office of social and international ministries, who helped lead the delegation. “In the name of security, the military has been given free rein to stop public protests, further corporate interests, investigate and detain activists. The militarization of society is compounding the levels of impunity.”
In this neighborhood of Tegucigalpa, local residents have hired private security officers to protect its block. Organized crime has penetrated a weak police force in Honduras, leaving people vulnerable. Police, prosecutors and judges serve only the most powerful, not the people they have the responsibility to protect, especially those in poorer communities. The state has basically delegated its job to private security companies.
Tegucigalpa at night.
The delegation brought the testimony of campesinos and community leaders to the United States Embassy in Tegucigalpa on Sept. 12, 2013, and the officials asked that we continue to share our human rights concerns with them. The officials explained that U.S. companies are not mining in Honduras at this time, but some companies have expressed interest, which makes it essential that U.S. officials have a clear understanding of concerns raised by local communities related to forced displacement, the natural environment and public health. The human rights officer in the embassy acknowledged human rights abuses in Honduras as a “fundamental, systemic problem,” but she said “we are only two people” in the human rights office, and “we are doing what we can.”
An armed soldier stands outside the U.S. Embassy in Tegucigalpa.
Padre Melo (left) interviews Gerardo Aguilar, S.J. (right), a student at Universad Centroamericana in Managua, Nicaragua, in the studio of Radio Progreso in El Progreso, Honduras, on Sept. 12, 2013. Padre Melo, the director of Radio Progreso and ERIC, offered testimony in July 2012 to the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the U.S. House of Representatives about the targeting and murder of journalists in Honduras. In recent years, 16 associates of Jesuit ministries have received credible death threats. Radio Progreso, which has about 1.5 million listeners, continues to receive intimidation and threats for its reporting and analysis of social problems, and one of its correspondents has been forced to leave the country.
Six of the eight members of the delegation pose for a photo at El Colegio de San Jose, a Jesuit-sponsored high school in El Progreso, Honduras. They are, left to right: Rafael Garcia, S.J., pastor of St. Francis Xavier Parish in Kansas City, Mo., Kirsti Tasala, youth and outreach coordinator for Canadian Jesuits International, Shaina Aber, policy director for the U.S. Jesuits’ social and international ministries, Nicholas Napolitano, provincial assistant for social ministries for the Maryland, New York and New England Provinces of the Society of Jesus, Mary Baudouin, provincial assistant for social ministries for Jesuits of the New Orleans Province, and Fernando Serrano, a professor in the College of Public Health and Social Justice at Saint Louis University. Not pictured are Kim Miller, program director of the Ignatian Solidarity Network, and Luke Hansen, S.J., associate editor of America.

 

Free trade with Honduras

Honduras, frontera clave para la droga hacia Estados Unidos

El 79% de la cocaína que vuela desde América del Sur aterriza en el país centroamericano. Desde allí sube hacia Guatemala por la frontera de Copán, donde deja un reguero de sangre y dinero, apadrinado por el ‘Chapo’ Guzmán

 

http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2014/01/06/actualidad/1389044788_511765.html

Un militar vigila la pista de aterrizaje de Puerto Lempira una de las zonas por las que transita la mayor cantidad de cocaína a través de Honduras / Edu Ponces / RUIDO Photo

En un país donde algunos políticos regalan ataúdes para ganar votos porque dos terceras partes de la población viven con menos de dos dólares al día, un entierro con mariachis y desfile de políticos es singular. Si además el difunto fue encontrado en una barranca, semidesnudo y con varios balazos cerca de una de las fronteras con más trasiego de droga, las sospechas saltan. El pasado mes de noviembre fue asesinado un prominente empresario del departamento de Copán, colindante con Guatemala. Su muerte seguramente no será investigada, como el 82% de las denuncias en Honduras, que ni siquiera llegan a juicio. Pero el vox populi ya lo ha condenado. “Narco-empresario”, le acusan en los foros de los periódicos, “estaba bien metido”, susurran en las calles. Aquí todos saben pero nadie se atreve a hablar públicamente.

El Departamento de Estado de los Estados Unidos estima que el 79% de la cocaína que sale por aire desde Sudamérica aterriza en cerca de las 200 pistas clandestinas que habría en Honduras, un estado endeble y limítrofe con cuatro países. De ahí se mueve por mar o por tierra hasta el norte. Copán es la última parada en suelo hondureño antes de cruzar a Guatemala. En sus 300 kilómetros de zona limítrofe se computan entre 20 y 25 puntos ciegos ideales para el paso de droga. “Tenemos esa colita de la frontera donde el narcotráfico ha crecido con la complicidad del Estado, que está totalmente permeado” explica un periodista local en un café enfrente de la catedral de Santa Rosa de Copán.

En esta región humilde de casas de adobe, cafetales y vacas flacas, el dinero del narcotráfico ha caído como agua bendita y ha salpicado todos los sectores. “Copán es el lugar para que los policías se hagan ricos”, confiesa un funcionario testigo de la colusión entre narcos y autoridades. Una red de corrupción e impunidad que se teje por todo el país pero que se acentúa en la frontera, donde policías, fiscales y jueces cierran los ojos a cambio de cuantiosos sobornos, una parte de los cuales llega hasta sus cabezas en la capital. “Hay una colusión entre la policía, el ministerio público y el crimen organizado que se ha ido acentuando cada vez más”, acusa María Luisa Borjas, ex directora de asuntos internos de la Policía. Ella misma estuvo destinada a Copán a finales de los 90 y recuerda como, cuando exigía más efectivos, le reclamaban que “pedía mucho y no mandaba nada”. Desde entonces el crimen encontró abono fértil para desarrollarse.

“El narco en Honduras empezó con pequeños grupos que servían de mulas (como se conoce a los que pasan pequeñas cantidades de drogas por las fronteras­) a gente mexicana, pero luego las mulas aprendieron el negocio y se convirtieron en los grandes jefes en puntos estratégicos del país”, explica una reportera especializada en temas de seguridad. Copán es uno de esos puntos. Por allí dicen que se pasea el capo más buscado del mundo, el Chapo Guzmán, jefe del mexicano Cartel de Sinaloa, que tiene a dos organizaciones copanecas a su servicio. En noviembre, el viceministro de defensa, Carlos Roberto Funes, reconoció públicamente que el Chapo va y viene. En Copán ya es un mito. “El Chapo ha utilizado el lugar como un refugio desde hace mucho. No permanece mucho en la zona por seguridad. En el Espíritu y el Paraíso son los dos puntos porque ahí hay puntos ciegos donde tú pasas y nadie dice nada”, narra esa misma reportera que ha tenido que dejar la zona por amenazas. Los criminales imponen la ley del silencio a golpes, ya sean físicos o de talonario. El trasiego de la droga también deja a su paso una estela de muerte.

Honduras es el país más violento del mundo. Con 8,2 millones de habitantes registra más de siete mil asesinatos al años, una tasa de 85,5 homicidios por cada cien mil personas. Copán llega a los 104. En España la media no llega a cuatro muertes violentas por cada cien mil habitantes. “Aunque no se investiguen, aquí la mayoría de las muertes están relacionadas con el narcotráfico, por pleitos entre ellos o por hablar más de la cuenta”, reconoce el funcionario copaneco. Por eso nadie quiere ser citado.

“El narco es un poder real en la zona, es un poder en el Congreso, en las elecciones de noviembre se eligieron al menos tres diputados de Copán vinculados al crimen pero todos se hacen de la vista gorda, porque hay derrama económica, desarrollo y más allá por miedo”, asevera una política local en la oposición. Donde antes habían calles polvorientas ahora florecen hoteles y centros comerciales. Tienen incluso el ayuntamiento más ostentoso de Honduras, una réplica barroca del Capitolio con helipuerto en la azotea. Está en el municipio fronterizo de El Paraíso, un pueblo de veinte mil habitantes que se convertía en lodazal en cada temporada de lluvias hasta 2005, cuando ganó la alcaldía Alexander Ardón, un antiguo arriero de ganado que ahora es señalado como el líder de uno de los socios de Guzmán en la región. En dos mandatos llevó la energía eléctrica hasta el último rincón, empedró las calles, erigió un mercado de un millón de dólares y el lujoso palacio municipal. Ardón, quién no comparece ante la prensa ni asiste a eventos públicos se atrevió a presentarse en el cierre de campaña de las elecciones del 24 de noviembre y desde el templete espetó “las guerras se ganan con estrategia, con ideas, no matando gente”. A finales de enero empezará su tercera alcaldía.

Honduras election: could a woman lead country with high rate of femicides?

The most dangerous country for women to live in could be about to elect its first female president, but extreme gender discrimination remains retrenched
Theguardian.com, Friday 22 November 2013 12.46 GMT
Xiomara Castro

Commentators have suggested Xiomara Castro is a surrogate for her ex-president husband, Manuel Zelaya Photograph: Gustavo Amador/EPA

The prospect of a woman winning the Honduras presidency in elections would be remarkable in any circumstances, given traditional male domination of the political scene. But the fact that Xiomara Castro, wife of deposed leftist president Manuel Zelaya, is running neck-and-neck with the ruling-party candidate is little short of extraordinary, given that Honduras is the most dangerous country in the world for women.

A Honduran woman is murdered every 15 hours and countless others are subject to violence and assault each day, making the country the most hostile place on earth for women, with the exception of actual war zones such as Syria or Congo. The phenomenon has many causes, some specific to Honduras, others less so. It also has a name – femicide. And the latest figures, collated by campaigners, suggest the problem is getting worse.

“With the highest homicide rate in the world, the UN calls Honduras ‘the most dangerous [peace time] country’ on the planet,” said Jacky Repila of Raising Her Voice, an Oxfam-backed project that has attempted to extend the rights and capacity of women in developing countries to influence and participate in governance.

“Of the 22,000 cases [involving women] reported in 2012, less than 2% were investigated … Between 2003 and 2007 the number of men murdered in Honduras rose by 50% [but] this increased to 160% for women, rising to 258% for the 2002-2012 period,” Repila said.

Gender-based violence and discrimination is endemic in Honduras, campaigners say. The upsurge in femicide is linked to the illegal drugs trade – Honduras has become a favoured entrepot for Mexican drug cartels servicing the US market. It also partly reflects the rise of other forms of organised crime, including prostitution and trafficking, the country’s gun culture and the militarisation of society that followed the 2009 coup against Zelaya.

But other country-specific factors are at work, too, including a machismo-fuelled habit of subordinating women and blaming them for their own problems – itself the product of what Oxfam described as a “growing and tangible hatred towards women”. Human rights activists and academics point to extreme gender discrimination in the home and in society, government ministries, the judiciary and law enforcement authorities.

“The victims of femicide are predominantly young women, between the ages of 20 and 24. This has given rise to authorities avoiding their responsibility and stating that the victims were at least partially responsible for the crimes committed against them,” said a report by the country’s National Campaign Against Femicide.

“These young women are predominantly murdered on public roads, in their houses or in private residences. Such places are supposedly places of security and protection. Their bodies are dumped on open ground.”

The report went on: “The measures implemented by Honduran state to counteract the problem of violence are primarily repressive in nature. The combination of remilitarisation of society as well as the increase in use and carrying of weapons has had particularly violent consequences for women …

“Impunity is a persistent part of the problem. Police authorities have been implicated and directly involved in extra-judicial killings and specific cases of femicide. As a result citizens, especially women, have a very high level of mistrust of police.”

While some measures have been enacted to counteract femicide, it said, “the country’s judicial bodies continue to dismiss international norms on violence against women. Criminal proceedings are long, difficult and reflect the little value given to loss of life in Honduras.”

Castro has promised to “refound” Honduras and achieve greater security, in part by reducing the internal role of the military and creating a more responsive community police force. .

But it is unclear how Castro might bring about the profound cultural shift that is required. Exhibiting typical male chauvinism, political commentators suggest she is a mere surrogate for her ex-president husband and that if she is elected, it is he who will really be in charge.

Por tercer año consecutivo, San Pedro Sula es la ciudad más violenta del mundo

Post 15 January 2014
Por José A. Ortega
Visitas: 7311

Con una tasa de 187 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, la urbe hondureña de San Pedro Sula ocupó por tercer año consecutivo el liderato del ranking de las 50 ciudades más violentas del mundo. El segundo lugar correspondió a Caracas, Venezuela y el tercero a Acapulco, México, con tasas de 134 y 113 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, respectivamente.

La situación de San Pedro no mejora, empeora. Si en 2010 figuró en el tercer lugar mundial con una tasa de 125 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, en 2011 pasó al primer lugar mundial con una tasa de 159 y en 2012 mantuvo la primera posición con una tasa que calculamos similar a la del año anterior, pero que después se supo era superior (174).

Ciudad Juárez siguió reduciendo su incidencia de homicidios y si había tenido el primer lugar mundial en los años 2008, 2009 y 2010, en 2011 tuvo el segundo lugar, en 2012 el 19 y ahora ocupa la posición 37.

Del ranking salieron las siguientes ciudades que figuraron en 2012: Brasilia y Curitiba de Brasil, Barranquilla de Colombia, Oakland de Estados Unidos y Monterrey de México. Todas estas ciudades tuvieron tasas inferiores a la del lugar 50 (Valencia, Venezuela con 30.04 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes).

Al ranking de 2013 ingresaron las ciudades brasileñas de Campina Grande, Natal y Aracaju y la colombiana de Palmira. Asimismo reingresó al ranking la ciudad mexicana de Tijuana, que había figurado entre 2008 y 2010 y no figuró en los rankings de 2011 y 2012.

De las 50 ciudades del ranking, 16 se ubican en Brasil, 9 en México, 6 en Colombia, 5 en Venezuela, 4 en Estados Unidos, 3 en Sudáfrica, 2 en Honduras y hay una de El Salvador, Guatemala, Jamaica y Puerto Rico.

Descarga ESTUDIO COMPLETO

La abrumadora mayoría de las 50 ciudades más violentas del mundo se ubican en el continente americano (46 ciudades) y en particular en América Latina (41 urbes).

Esto confirma lo que revelan diversos estudios globales por país: que la violencia homicida en América Latina presenta una incidencia muy por encima de la media mundial.

La situación de América Latina no es igual en todos los países, claro está. El nivel de violencia es considerablemente menor a la media latinoamericana en países como Chile, Nicaragua, Costa Rica o Argentina.

Los países latinoamericanos con el mayor problema de violencia son Honduras, Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, México y Brasil.

Asimismo el proceso más exitoso y encomiable en la reducción de la violencia es el de Colombia. Resulta especialmente meritorio que desde hace 11 años sigan bajando la incidencia de homicidios y otros delitos violentos debido a la cada vez mayor eficacia de la policía y no como resultado de la negociación con criminales (como es el caso de El Salvador).

Ahora bien, el mayor obstáculo que un esfuerzo de investigación como el que representa el ranking enfrenta, es la falta de transparencia de los gobiernos de varios de los países. Peor aún es la práctica de falsificar cifras que realizan gobernantes de algunas naciones, específicamente de México y Venezuela.

Respecto al gobierno de Venezuela por sus actos ha demostrado que no le interesa la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas sino el ocultamiento o la propaganda, muchas veces basada en mentiras. Esta política del gobierno venezolano de hacer propaganda en lugar de resolver el problema de la violencia, confirma el temor de que Venezuela se conduce hacia el abismo.

En México en teoría hay transparencia informativa, para lo cual se hace público mes por mes la estadística de incidencia criminal, desglosada en decenas de tipos penales y con grado de desagregación estatal y, desde 2011, municipal.

El problema es que los gobiernos de no pocas entidades federativas falsifican las cifras, para simular una incidencia criminal inferior a la real.

Esta falsificación se constata cuando se cotejan las cifras de homicidios (y otros delitos) que los gobiernos locales reportan con las que genera el Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI), las cuales son más abultadas y resultan de un ejercicio más profesional y más honesto.

Al respecto quepa citar a manera de ejemplo los casos más escandalosos de discrepancia, que evidencian la manipulación de cifras y que tienen relación directa con el ranking, los cuales corresponden a los estados de Tamaulipas, Coahuila y Chihuahua. Los datos son 2012, pues el INEGI hasta mediados de 2014 dará a conocer sus cifras preliminares de 2013.

El caso más escandaloso de falsificación de cifras es el de Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas. El gobierno del estado reportó 288 homicidios en 2012. Con esa cifra y una tasa de 72.85 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, se ubicó en el octavo lugar del ranking de las 50 ciudades más violentas del mundo.

Pero el INEGI registró 544 homicidios, es decir, ¡un 88.89% más! Eso significa que la tasa de Nuevo Laredo en realidad fue 137.61 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, con lo cual el lugar que le habría correspondido en el ranking sería el tercero mundial.

El segundo caso de falsificación de cifras se refiere al municipio de Torreón Coahuila. El gobierno local reportó al SE-SNSP un total de 462 homicidios en 2012, cuando que el INEGI registró 792, es decir, un 71.43% más.

El tercer caso notorio de falsificación de cifras corresponde al municipio de Chihuahua, capital del estado del mismo nombre. El gobierno local reportó al SE-SNSP un total de 363 homicidios en 2012, mientras que el INEGI registró 587, es decir, un 61.71% más. Es decir, en el lugar de la posición 32 en el ranking que tuvo Chihuahua con una tasa de 43.49 homicidios por cada 100 mil habitantes, en realidad tenía que haber sido la posición 12, con una tasa de 69.56.

Cuando el gobierno del Presidente Enrique Peña festina la supuesta baja de la incidencia de homicidios en México ¿cómo creer en las cifras oficiales cuando están basadas en estos fraudes?

Por lo demás no es de esperar una disminución significativa de la violencia en México cuando la nueva administración, como la anterior, carece de una política eficaz y ni siquiera es capaz de poner en práctica sus cuestionables programas como el de crear una nueva policía (¡otra más!), la gendarmería nacional.

Lic. José Antonio Ortega Sánchez
Presidente del Consejo Ciudadano para la
Seguridad Pública y la Justicia Penal, A. C.

Posición Ciudad País Homicidios Habitantes Tasa
1 San Pedro Sula Honduras 1,411 753,990 187.14
2 Caracas Venezuela 4,364 3,247,971 134.36
3 Acapulco México 940 833,294 112.80
4 Cali Colombia 1,930 2,319,684 83.20
5 Maceió Brasil 795 996,733 79.76
6 Distrito Central Honduras 946 1,191,111 79.42
7 Fortaleza Brasil 2,754 3,782,634 72.81
8 Guatemala Guatemala 2,123 3,103,685 68.40
9 João Pessoa Brasil 515 769,607 66.92
10 Barquisimeto Venezuela 804 1,242,351 64.72

Conexiones entre políticos y criminales impiden la aplicación de la ley en Honduras

  • Por 
  • Jueves, 16 Enero 2014 17:20

El informe anual de Insight Crime, organización independiente dedicada a la investigación y análisis del crimen organizado en América Latina y el Caribe, destaca que 2013 fue un año difícil para Honduras. El documento revela que mientras el flagelo se mantiene en la impunidad, las autoridades evitan realizar acciones que para el combate de la criminalidad y la corrupción.

El informe detalle que los grupos de crimen organizado, como el “Chepe” y los Cachiros han utilizado la violencia como amenaza contra el uso de la extradición, una medida que el Congreso Nacional aprobó al principio de 2012 como herramienta para enfrentar el crimen organizado. Además recrimina que siendo la extradición una herramienta a la que temen los narcotraficantes, en Honduras  no se haya utilizado debido a las conexiones existentes entre políticos y criminales.

El crimen del fiscal Chávez, Insight Crime lo ha vinculado a las acciones realizadas por  la Fiscalía de Privación de Dominio para asegurar a favor del Estado, 14 propiedades de José Miguel Handal Pérez, conocido como “Chepe” Handal, acción llevada a cabo en abril del año pasado, luego que las autoridades conocieran un informe del Departamento del Tesoro de Estados Unidos, que identifica al empresario  como narcotraficante.

El documento señala que el Estado ha perdido control de varias regiones en el país, mientras la inseguridad continua provocando una dependencia en las empresas de seguridad privada que también sirven como organizaciones para esconder actividades criminales como el narcotráfico. “Todas estas señales son preocupantes para el futuro de país”, refiere el documento tras señalar que mientras las autoridades sigan manteniendo los niveles de impunidad existentes, la situación no mejorará.

La investigación también recoge situaciones similares que viven diferentes países de la región. En este contexto se refiere que en México el crecimiento de grupos vigilantes ha provocado choques violentos entre carteles y ciudadanos armados. Asegura  que se han registrado enfrentamientos entre las fuerzas de seguridad y los grupos vigilantes, que acusan la policía de ser corrupta.

En El Salvador, Insight Crime advierte que el tratado entre las maras probablemente se quebrará, sugiriendo que no representa la mejor ruta para abordar temas de violencia en una manera sostenible. Y finalmente señala que en Colombia el aumento de poder por el grupo criminal los Urabeños y la posibilidad de un quebramiento entre las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) antes o después de las negociaciones que se están llevando a cabo en Habana entre el gobierno colombiano y el grupo guerrillero sugiere que el país tiene mucho que hacer para crear un verdadero entorno de paz.

¿Qué significan estas experiencias para Honduras?, más que todo, los nuevos líderes del país tienen que recordar que cualquier esfuerzo realizado para mejorar la situación de seguridad debe ser sostenible, con atención a las causas verdaderas del crimen en el país: la impunidad, la falta de oportunidad, y la corrupción, entre otros. La experiencia de otros países y su propia experiencia han demostrado definitivamente estas realidades.

Ultima modificación Viernes, 17 Enero 2014 13:15

Pactos y negociaciones arrancan en Honduras buscando “gobernabilidad”

Ene 17, 2014

Como respuesta a las acciones y leyes aprobadas por el actual gobierno, diputados electos de tres partidos firmaron la presente semana un pacto de oposición. La firma se dio con el objetivo de unificar esfuerzos para revertir el paquetazo fiscal aprobado por el Congreso Nacional el pasado 23 de diciembre, además de crear una nueva ley orgánica que regule al poder Legislativo, impulsar la creación de una ley anticorrupción y la aprobación de una normativa que reduzca y revise los salarios de los más altos niveles en la administración pública.

Al espacio asistieron diputados y el coordinador del Partido Anticorrupción, diputados y la ex presidenciable Xiomara Castro del Partido Libertad y Refundación y la diputada por el departamento de Francisco Morazán Doris Gutiérrez, del Pinu.

La nueva conformación del Congreso Nacional, 48 diputados del Partido Nacional, 13 del Partido Anticorrupción, 37 de Libre, 27 del Liberal, un diputado tanto del PINU, UD, DC obliga a iniciar negociaciones y pactos para lograr consensos, han asegurado diversos analistas políticos.

La convocatoria a este acercamiento fue girada por Salvador Nasralla del PAC, quien cree necesario comenzar a lograr pactos para derogar leyes que son nocivas para los intereses de las mayorías.

“Les he dicho a mis diputados que desde el primer día de sesiones deben introducir la necesidad de crear una ley anticorrupción. Únicamente con el paquetazo aprobado se van a generar 12 mil millones de lempiras anuales y de acuerdo con organismos internacionales y el mismo Fosdeh cada año se pierden por actos de corrupción 50 mil millones de lempiras de los 172 mil millones que compone el presupuesto general de la república, esto no lo podemos permitir”, apuntó Nasralla.

El también periodista deportivo aseguró que han conversado con diputados del partido Liberal para que se unan a este pacto de oposición, “pero esos diputados tienen miedo, están atemorizados por las estructuras de poder que controlan Honduras,  ellos prefieren quedarse con el dinero que ganan siendo funcionarios.  Al final demuestran que son la misma cosa que los nacionalistas, se casan entre ellos, actúan como ellos y roban igual que ellos”, concluyó el ex presidenciable del PAC.

Un nuevo escenario

Xiomara Castro por su parte junto a la mayoría de diputados del partido Libertad y Refundación aseguraron que en Honduras se abren nuevos escenarios de la realidad política del país, producto del surgimiento de los nuevos partidos que se convierten en la esperanza para el pueblo.

“A la gente le toca hacer los señalamientos de  quiénes están a su favor, aquí no se trata de seguir al caudillismo, sino de lograr acciones para derogar el paquetazo y otras medidas que se han aprobado en contra del pueblo. Fueron ellos los que utilizaron fondos públicos para financiar sus campañas y ahora hacen que la gente pague por sus abusos aplicando impuestos groseros”, dijo Castro.

La regidora capitalina y diputada electa por el Pinu, Doris Gutiérrez manifestó que el hambre no tiene color político, por tanto se convierte en una oportunidad real oposición en el Congreso Nacional. “Necesitamos con urgencia lograr los 65 diputados para tener mayoría simple, solo así podremos comenzar una nueva era en el  poder Legislativo”.

Sobre las negociaciones que existen para el nombramiento de la nueva junta directiva del Congreso Nacional, Gutiérrez cree que será muy difícil que no sea nombrada por el partido Nacional, debido al negativo papel que están desempeñando los liberales, quienes aun no están conscientes de la oportunidad histórica que tienen, pero espera que el pueblo los juzgue por su accionar.

Los máximos dirigentes del Partido Liberal se encuentran en plenas negociaciones, aunque no han manifestado si su apoyo será al partido en el poder o se suman a la oposición que tiene una agenda clara de acciones productos de accionar del actual y futuro gobierno.

Pacto por Honduras

Esta misma semana, con la presencia de algunos sectores, Juan Orlando Hernández convocó a la firma de un “Pacto por Honduras” el cual en propias palabras del gobernante busca consolidar una amplia base de respaldo para la promoción de la paz y el desarrollo de la población.

La búsqueda de “gobernabilidad” ha sido el origen que han mencionado los dos grupos, la oposición y la oficialidad, para la firma de estos pactos.

Por su parte, Juan Orlando Hernández leyó las cinco mesas de trabajo que quedaron integradas con la firma del Pacto por Honduras:
1: Recuperar la Paz y la seguridad de las familias hondureñas.
2: Alcanzar una sociedad más justa, con igualdad de oportunidades, en donde todos contemos.
3: Conducir al país al pleno goce de sus potencialidades.
4: Instaurar una cultura de honestidad, legalidad y transparencia.
5: Perfeccionar la democracia y construir un Gobierno simple y eficiente.

El documento firmado menciona la necesidad de obtener el respaldo para impulsar una serie de reformas estructurales en el ámbito económico, político y social que, debiendo ser aprobadas por el Congreso Nacional y materializadas por el Poder Ejecutivo y el Poder Judicial, tengan como expectativa conducir a Honduras al pleno goce de sus potencialidades y a la construcción de una sociedad más justa, en donde se propicie la reducción de la inequidad y las desigualdades.

Para el analista y escritor, Julio Escoto, este pacto carece de credibilidad principalmente porque no ha sido invitada la nueva oposición en Honduras y simplemente se ha llamado a grupos afines con los que trabajaría el nuevo gobierno. “Fue un acto social y demagógico que no va a hacer que ocurra nada”, dijo Escoto.

Escoto afirma que en el periodo de Manuel Zelaya se creó un plan de nación hasta 2030 que lastimosamente no se llevó a cabo por el golpe de Estado, también vimos este esfuerzo en el caso de Lobo quien creó otro plan que no marcó su agenda de gobierno.

“Solo son buenos deseos, no hay objetividad ni concreción sobre ello porque un documento de 10 o 20 páginas no es un plan de desarrollo de país o un plan de gobierno, para esto se necesita participación de expertos en todas la áreas”, explicó Escoto.

Honduras, frontera clave para la droga hacia Estados Unidos

El 79% de la cocaína que vuela desde América del Sur aterriza en el país centroamericano. Desde allí sube hacia Guatemala por la frontera de Copán, donde deja un reguero de sangre y dinero, apadrinado por el ‘Chapo’ Guzmán

 

http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2014/01/06/actualidad/1389044788_511765.html

Un militar vigila la pista de aterrizaje de Puerto Lempira una de las zonas por las que transita la mayor cantidad de cocaína a través de Honduras / Edu Ponces / RUIDO Photo

En un país donde algunos políticos regalan ataúdes para ganar votos porque dos terceras partes de la población viven con menos de dos dólares al día, un entierro con mariachis y desfile de políticos es singular. Si además el difunto fue encontrado en una barranca, semidesnudo y con varios balazos cerca de una de las fronteras con más trasiego de droga, las sospechas saltan. El pasado mes de noviembre fue asesinado un prominente empresario del departamento de Copán, colindante con Guatemala. Su muerte seguramente no será investigada, como el 82% de las denuncias en Honduras, que ni siquiera llegan a juicio. Pero el vox populi ya lo ha condenado. “Narco-empresario”, le acusan en los foros de los periódicos, “estaba bien metido”, susurran en las calles. Aquí todos saben pero nadie se atreve a hablar públicamente.

El Departamento de Estado de los Estados Unidos estima que el 79% de la cocaína que sale por aire desde Sudamérica aterriza en cerca de las 200 pistas clandestinas que habría en Honduras, un estado endeble y limítrofe con cuatro países. De ahí se mueve por mar o por tierra hasta el norte. Copán es la última parada en suelo hondureño antes de cruzar a Guatemala. En sus 300 kilómetros de zona limítrofe se computan entre 20 y 25 puntos ciegos ideales para el paso de droga. “Tenemos esa colita de la frontera donde el narcotráfico ha crecido con la complicidad del Estado, que está totalmente permeado” explica un periodista local en un café enfrente de la catedral de Santa Rosa de Copán.

En esta región humilde de casas de adobe, cafetales y vacas flacas, el dinero del narcotráfico ha caído como agua bendita y ha salpicado todos los sectores. “Copán es el lugar para que los policías se hagan ricos”, confiesa un funcionario testigo de la colusión entre narcos y autoridades. Una red de corrupción e impunidad que se teje por todo el país pero que se acentúa en la frontera, donde policías, fiscales y jueces cierran los ojos a cambio de cuantiosos sobornos, una parte de los cuales llega hasta sus cabezas en la capital. “Hay una colusión entre la policía, el ministerio público y el crimen organizado que se ha ido acentuando cada vez más”, acusa María Luisa Borjas, ex directora de asuntos internos de la Policía. Ella misma estuvo destinada a Copán a finales de los 90 y recuerda como, cuando exigía más efectivos, le reclamaban que “pedía mucho y no mandaba nada”. Desde entonces el crimen encontró abono fértil para desarrollarse.

“El narco en Honduras empezó con pequeños grupos que servían de mulas (como se conoce a los que pasan pequeñas cantidades de drogas por las fronteras­) a gente mexicana, pero luego las mulas aprendieron el negocio y se convirtieron en los grandes jefes en puntos estratégicos del país”, explica una reportera especializada en temas de seguridad. Copán es uno de esos puntos. Por allí dicen que se pasea el capo más buscado del mundo, el Chapo Guzmán, jefe del mexicano Cartel de Sinaloa, que tiene a dos organizaciones copanecas a su servicio. En noviembre, el viceministro de defensa, Carlos Roberto Funes, reconoció públicamente que el Chapo va y viene. En Copán ya es un mito. “El Chapo ha utilizado el lugar como un refugio desde hace mucho. No permanece mucho en la zona por seguridad. En el Espíritu y el Paraíso son los dos puntos porque ahí hay puntos ciegos donde tú pasas y nadie dice nada”, narra esa misma reportera que ha tenido que dejar la zona por amenazas. Los criminales imponen la ley del silencio a golpes, ya sean físicos o de talonario. El trasiego de la droga también deja a su paso una estela de muerte.

Honduras es el país más violento del mundo. Con 8,2 millones de habitantes registra más de siete mil asesinatos al años, una tasa de 85,5 homicidios por cada cien mil personas. Copán llega a los 104. En España la media no llega a cuatro muertes violentas por cada cien mil habitantes. “Aunque no se investiguen, aquí la mayoría de las muertes están relacionadas con el narcotráfico, por pleitos entre ellos o por hablar más de la cuenta”, reconoce el funcionario copaneco. Por eso nadie quiere ser citado.

“El narco es un poder real en la zona, es un poder en el Congreso, en las elecciones de noviembre se eligieron al menos tres diputados de Copán vinculados al crimen pero todos se hacen de la vista gorda, porque hay derrama económica, desarrollo y más allá por miedo”, asevera una política local en la oposición. Donde antes habían calles polvorientas ahora florecen hoteles y centros comerciales. Tienen incluso el ayuntamiento más ostentoso de Honduras, una réplica barroca del Capitolio con helipuerto en la azotea. Está en el municipio fronterizo de El Paraíso, un pueblo de veinte mil habitantes que se convertía en lodazal en cada temporada de lluvias hasta 2005, cuando ganó la alcaldía Alexander Ardón, un antiguo arriero de ganado que ahora es señalado como el líder de uno de los socios de Guzmán en la región. En dos mandatos llevó la energía eléctrica hasta el último rincón, empedró las calles, erigió un mercado de un millón de dólares y el lujoso palacio municipal. Ardón, quién no comparece ante la prensa ni asiste a eventos públicos se atrevió a presentarse en el cierre de campaña de las elecciones del 24 de noviembre y desde el templete espetó “las guerras se ganan con estrategia, con ideas, no matando gente”. A finales de enero empezará su tercera alcaldía.